Leaked Ryzen 7 2700X Data Suggests Significant Clock Boost for New AMD CPUs

AMD’s Ryzen 7 family reignited the desktop performance wars last year after nearly seven years of small iterative improvements. The company’s Zen architecture proved more competitive than most expected, and AMD’s top-end desktop cores ruled the multi-threaded roost until Coffee Lake — and arguably past that, given how hard it was to find Coffee Lake in stock during October and November of last year. AMD has already told investors and enthusiasts to expect a new Zen CPU core in the not-too-distant future, but this new revision is a refinement of the existing chip built on GlobalFoundries tuned 14nm process (rebranded as 12nm). The performance jumps from these improvements tend to be smaller, but this is also AMD’s first chance to clean up any low-hanging fruit from Ryzen’s debut and to improve overall performance, which could point the way to larger-than-typical gains.

We don’t know much about how Ryzen+’s clock-for-clock perf will stack up against chips like the Ryzen 7 1800X, but it looks like the revised cores will pack a modest clock speed gain, especially if AMD is more aggressive about holding turbo clocks at high core ratios. If these figures are accurate for the Ryzen 7 2700X, we can make some guesses about a possible Ryzen 7 2800X as well. A 3.9GHz base clock and, say, 4.3GHz boost clock combined with a 4GHz all-core boost would capture an 8 percent clock jump under full load. If AMD has found any small issues to clean up simultaneously — call it 2-3 percent worth of performance — then Ryzen+ could deliver a 7-10 percent gain year-on-year over and above first-generation Ryzen processors.

Is that going to drive an upgrade cycle for existing Ryzen owners? Probably not. But Ryzen+ isn’t intended to reinvent the wheel. Having debuted a brand-new architecture to general acclaim, AMD needs to demonstrate it can iterate on that architecture to continue improving it and that it has picked the right partner to work with on future CPU designs. GlobalFoundries, of course, has its own interest in demonstrating it’s the proper partner for AMD’s efforts as well. The third and final component of this demonstration will be proving that AMD and GlobalFoundries can bring competitive products to market based on GF’s 7nm technology, but that won’t happen until 2019 or 2020. For now, clearing this second hurdle will help demonstrate that AMD will be delivering consistent quality updates over time.

The other reason AMD is likely gunning for higher clocks is so it can open more distance between itself and the Core i7-8700K. When we reviewed the 8700K, we noted that its high single-thread performance and excellent multi-threading perf were enough to make it a stronger overall recommendation than the 1800X. If AMD picks up another 8-10 percent performance, the hypothetical Ryzen 7 2800X should start to open up distance between itself and the Core i7-8700K again.

Finally, these clock speed increases will help reduce the impact of performance deficits that remain between Intel and AMD in specific tests. We don’t know much at this point, but this hypothetical Ryzen 7 2700X ticks all the major boxes — it opens up the throttle, improves performance in the process, and will give AMD a modest competitive boost.

Continue reading

The PlayStation 5 Will Only Be Available Online for Launch Day

The PlayStation 5 isn't going to be available in stores on launch day, and if you want to pick up an M.2 SSD to expand its storage, you'll have some time to figure out that purchase.

Jupiter’s Moon Europa Might Glow in the Dark

The intense radiation bombarding Europa might make it glow in the dark, and that could help scientists learn more about the moon's ice sheets and the ocean below.

Which Is Faster, the Xbox Series X or PlayStation 5? Early Data Says It’s Complicated

Competitive head-to-head data on the Xbox Series X versus the PlayStation 5 is beginning to trickle out.

Time to Update: Google Patches 2 Severe Zero-Day Chrome Vulnerabilities

Unlike the last few zero-days, Google didn't find these security holes itself. Instead, it was tipped by anonymous third-parties, and the problems are severe enough that it hasn't released full details. Suffice it to say, you should stop putting off that update.