The Milky Way Might Have a Core of Dark Matter Instead of a Black Hole

The Milky Way Might Have a Core of Dark Matter Instead of a Black Hole

The current scientific consensus is that a supermassive black hole lurks at the center of our galaxy. We know that’s true in other galaxies — there’s even photographic evidence of a black hole in M87. However, a new study suggests that the Milky Way might not have a black hole. The object, known as Sagittarius A*, may actually be a blob of dark matter, based on the properties of several objects spotted zipping around it. If true, this would have major implications for our understanding of the universe.

The problem is we can’t see Sagittarius A* (pronounced “Sagittarius A star”) directly, which is what you’d expect from a black hole. We can only infer its presence from the motion of objects around it, which do indeed appear to be under the influence of a very massive object. In the past, scientists have used the motion of objects like the star S2 to validate general relativity as they swung past the supposed black hole. But then there’s G2; this object, which may or may not be a cloud of hydrogen gas, flew past Sagittarius A* a while back, and it didn’t get torn asunder as expected.

Last year, a group of Italian researchers showed that the movement of S2 and G2 was also consistent with a different model, one in which the center of the Milky Way is inhabited by dark matter fermions. These particles are ultra-light, so they would not collapse into a black hole until there were about 100 times more of them. At the same time, they could cluster together in a dark blob and affect nearby objects with their gravity.

In the new study, which was accepted for publication in MNRAS Letters, the team expanded that model to the 17 best-characterized S-group stars orbiting the galactic center. And sure enough, it’s a fit — these orbits are compatible with a bubble of dark matter in Sagittarius A* instead of a black hole.

The Milky Way Might Have a Core of Dark Matter Instead of a Black Hole

Scientists currently estimate the visible part of the universe only makes up about 20 percent of its total mass. The remainder is dark matter, a substance we have yet to properly characterize. Like black holes, we can only infer dark matter’s presence from gravitational effects. This study could mean that the two phenomena are related. The team proposes that these clumps of dark matter can reach critical mass and collapse into black holes. That could help to explain how these enormous supermassive objects come to be in the first place, something that we have only been able to speculate on. At the same time, this could account for a lot of the universe’s missing mass.

However, this is all far from certain. There could be other explanations, or the analysis carried out by this group could be wrong. We won’t know until scientists have spent a lot more time staring at this corner of space.

Continue reading

New Study Suggests Dark Matter Doesn’t Exist
New Study Suggests Dark Matter Doesn’t Exist

Most scientists currently believe the iron grip of gravity is augmented by dark matter, an invisible material that makes up about 85 percent of the universe. A new study makes the case for an alternative model, one in which dark matter doesn't exist and gravity works a little differently than we thought.

Fast-Spinning Black Holes May Narrow Search for Dark Matter
Fast-Spinning Black Holes May Narrow Search for Dark Matter

The possible existence of dark matter is one of the more vexing problems in physics, but a team from MIT thinks fast-spinning black holes might help narrow the search for these mysterious particles.

Dark Matter Could Solve the Mystery of Supermassive Black Hole Formation
Dark Matter Could Solve the Mystery of Supermassive Black Hole Formation

This work is all based on simulations, but we might have the means to verify Yu's work experimentally before long.

Whether Your Sunscreen Is ‘Reef-Safe’ Does Matter—But There’s a Catch
Whether Your Sunscreen Is ‘Reef-Safe’ Does Matter—But There’s a Catch

What does “reef-safe” actually mean, and how much can you depend on it?