Lawsuit: Apple and Amazon Conspired to Raise iPad and iPhone Prices

Lawsuit: Apple and Amazon Conspired to Raise iPad and iPhone Prices

Amazon has become the retail behemoth it is in part thanks to third-party sellers. Amazon doesn’t need to stock or ship many of the things sold on the site, giving it a much wider selection than smaller competitors. One notable exception is Apple, which has an agreement in place with Amazon to limit the number of sellers allowed to list its products. A new lawsuit claims this is an unlawful violation of antitrust law that has cost consumers big bucks.

As recently as 2018, there were more than 600 entities selling Apple products on Amazon. This ensured robust competition, which kept prices a bit lower than Apple’s own store. However, that all changed in late 2018 when Amazon and Apple teamed up to bring more Apple hardware to the site. As part of the agreement, Amazon would only allow third parties to sell Apple hardware if they were approved by Apple. Today, there are just seven companies offering the products on Amazon.

According to the law firm Hagens Berman, which has filed a class-action antitrust case, Apple and Amazon have benefited hugely from the agreement while consumers have been paying higher prices. Amazon reportedly got access to a continuous supply of Apple devices to sell at a 10 percent discount, provided it kept third-party sellers off the site. The suit claims this is known as “naked restraint,” and is illegal under the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Lawsuit: Apple and Amazon Conspired to Raise iPad and iPhone Prices

Following the start of the retail agreement in January 2019, Amazon became much more likely to get placement in the “buy box,” increasing its revenue from Apple devices. Apple, meanwhile, no longer had to worry about sellers on Amazon undercutting it. The suit contends that buyers are paying up to 20 percent more than they otherwise would. There is some precedent for this case. Italian regulators slapped Amazon with a fine last year for a similar deal involving Apple’s Beats audio products, reports Ars Technica.

Hagens Berman will be familiar to those who follow Apple news. The firm was involved in numerous legal actions against Apple over the years, including the ebook price-fixing case and a battle over touchscreen patents. Hagens Berman clearly feels there’s money to be made going after Apple, and this time, consumers might be able to benefit. The law firm is asking anyone who purchased an Apple product via the Amazon buy box in 2019 or later to join the class action. In a few years, you might get part of your purchase refunded, and Hagens Berman will get a big heap of cash.

Continue reading

Nvidia Wins Billion-Dollar Crypto Mining Lawsuit
Nvidia Wins Billion-Dollar Crypto Mining Lawsuit

Nvidia has won a lawsuit brought against it by multiple investors who claimed the company had deliberately and recklessly misrepresented the provenance of over a billion dollars in crypto-mining sales. We still have an ongoing GPU disaster in the PC channel.

Google Fails to Win Dismissal of Incognito Mode Lawsuit
Google Fails to Win Dismissal of Incognito Mode Lawsuit

The lawsuit claims Google still tracks users across the internet, even if they're using Incognito Mode. Google's defense is not that the plaintiffs are mistaken, but rather that it told everyone very clearly they could still be tracked.

Activision Lawsuit Demands End to ‘Frat Boy’ Company Culture
Activision Lawsuit Demands End to ‘Frat Boy’ Company Culture

For more than two years, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing has investigated Activision Blizzard Inc. for "violations of the state's civil rights and equal pay laws.” The investigation uncovered a variety of downright abhorrent behaviors that range from unfair to blatantly criminal in nature.

Apple Hit With Class Action Lawsuit Over Shattered M1 MacBook Displays
Apple Hit With Class Action Lawsuit Over Shattered M1 MacBook Displays

Apple's M1 systems might have a problem after all. The actual SoC is fine, but the company has been sued over how easy it is to break the display.