Police Use Genealogy Web Service to Catch Golden State Killer Suspect
After decades with no leads, Sacramento police and the FBI announced several days ago they had arrested a suspect believed to be the Golden State Killer. Joseph James DeAngelo, aged 72, has been living in the same areas terrorized by the Golden State Killer in the 1970s and 80s, and he might have continued to live a quiet and seemingly normal life if not for an online genealogy database. Police reportedly used data from one of these sites to identify DeAngelo as a suspect, later confirming his identity with DNA testing.
The Golden State Killer, sometimes known as the East Area Rapist or Original Night Stalker, was active in California from 1976 to 1986. During that time, police believe he was responsible for at least 50 rapes and 12 murders. After the attacks ended, police were left with no leads. They did, however, have the Golden State Killer’s DNA. All they lacked was a suspect with whom to match it. That’s where the internet comes in.
There are plenty of companies that will test your DNA and tell you about your ancestry and medical status. Some of the most popular are 23andMe and Ancestry.com. There are numerous smaller operations, too. Police reportedly used data from a website called GEDmatch, which promises to help people analyze their DNA for genealogical research purposes. Unlike most sites, GEDmatch’s privacy policy makes it clear user data will be provided to other researchers. The company claims it was not cooperating with authorities, but there was nothing stopping investigators from using the site’s tools like anyone else.
Of course, DeAngelo was not brazen enough to put his DNA in an online database. Police instead found several distant family members in GEDmatch that shared similarity with the Golden State Killer. From there, it was a simple matter to find people related to those individuals in the right geographic area who matched the profile from decades earlier. That led them to DeAngelo, but it wasn’t enough for an arrest. Police followed DeAngelo in order to collect DNA samples from discarded objects. DeAngelo’s DNA was a match for samples taken from the crime scenes, and police made the arrest.
It’s an unequivocally good thing that the Golden State Killer is behind bars, but some privacy advocates worry about the use of such services to solve crimes. Partial matches from familial DNA can cause police to scrutinize innocent people — this has happened at least once. Eventually, it could deter individuals from providing DNA for research and genealogy purposes entirely.
The outcome of this investigation was a positive for society, but some people will be understandably uncomfortable with police poking around in their DNA to see who among their relations may have committed a crime.
Continue reading
Newegg Changes Return Policy to Combat Scammers, Harm Customers
Newegg is trying to crack down on scammers, but it's catching regular users in the same net.
Microsoft Needs to Clarify Its Windows 11 Update Policy Before Launch
Microsoft is now requiring people to acknowledge a waiver to run Windows 11 on unsupported configurations, but it has yet to clarify exactly how unsupported people are going to be.
Predictive Policing Software Shown to Entrench Bias, not Address It
A new analysis by Gizmodo has concluded that such software disproportionately targets poor communities and communities of color.
Amazon Gave Ring Footage to Police Without a Warrant or Owner Consent
This isn't the first time Ring has been caught in bed with law enforcement, and based on what Amazon’s vice president of public policy told government officials, it won't be the last.