Police Use Genealogy Web Service to Catch Golden State Killer Suspect

After decades with no leads, Sacramento police and the FBI announced several days ago they had arrested a suspect believed to be the Golden State Killer. Joseph James DeAngelo, aged 72, has been living in the same areas terrorized by the Golden State Killer in the 1970s and 80s, and he might have continued to live a quiet and seemingly normal life if not for an online genealogy database. Police reportedly used data from one of these sites to identify DeAngelo as a suspect, later confirming his identity with DNA testing.

The Golden State Killer, sometimes known as the East Area Rapist or Original Night Stalker, was active in California from 1976 to 1986. During that time, police believe he was responsible for at least 50 rapes and 12 murders. After the attacks ended, police were left with no leads. They did, however, have the Golden State Killer’s DNA. All they lacked was a suspect with whom to match it. That’s where the internet comes in.

There are plenty of companies that will test your DNA and tell you about your ancestry and medical status. Some of the most popular are 23andMe and Ancestry.com. There are numerous smaller operations, too. Police reportedly used data from a website called GEDmatch, which promises to help people analyze their DNA for genealogical research purposes. Unlike most sites, GEDmatch’s privacy policy makes it clear user data will be provided to other researchers. The company claims it was not cooperating with authorities, but there was nothing stopping investigators from using the site’s tools like anyone else.

Of course, DeAngelo was not brazen enough to put his DNA in an online database. Police instead found several distant family members in GEDmatch that shared similarity with the Golden State Killer. From there, it was a simple matter to find people related to those individuals in the right geographic area who matched the profile from decades earlier. That led them to DeAngelo, but it wasn’t enough for an arrest. Police followed DeAngelo in order to collect DNA samples from discarded objects. DeAngelo’s DNA was a match for samples taken from the crime scenes, and police made the arrest.

It’s an unequivocally good thing that the Golden State Killer is behind bars, but some privacy advocates worry about the use of such services to solve crimes. Partial matches from familial DNA can cause police to scrutinize innocent people — this has happened at least once. Eventually, it could deter individuals from providing DNA for research and genealogy purposes entirely.

The outcome of this investigation was a positive for society, but some people will be understandably uncomfortable with police poking around in their DNA to see who among their relations may have committed a crime.

Continue reading

Chromebooks Gain Market Share as Education Goes Online

Chromebook sales have exploded in the pandemic, with sales up 90 percent and future growth expected. This poses some challenges to companies like Microsoft.

Which Is Faster, the Xbox Series X or PlayStation 5? Early Data Says It’s Complicated

Competitive head-to-head data on the Xbox Series X versus the PlayStation 5 is beginning to trickle out.

SpaceX Plans to ‘Catch’ Super Heavy Rockets With Launch Tower

Legs Who needs 'em? Not the new SpaceX Super Heavy booster, if Elon Musk's latest tweets are true.

New Beagle Board Offers Dual-Core RISC-V, Targets AI Applications

Budget RISC-V hardware is on the way, and it's a heck of a lot more affordable than anything we've seen in the past, with just enough CPU horsepower that a hobbyist might be able to do something with it. Later models may compete with chips like Raspberry Pi, though likely at higher cost.