DDR4 Scaling and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: Do Higher Clocks Boost Performance?

DDR4 Scaling and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G: Do Higher Clocks Boost Performance?

Ever since AMD launched its first APU family, it’s been clear that faster RAM had a significant impact on performance. With the Ryzen 5 2400G, the potential impact of faster DDR4 could be even more significant. The CPU-GPU interconnect system uses AMD’s Infinity Fabric as well, and Infinity Fabric’s clock is directly tied to DRAM clock.

We decided to put the Ryzen 5 2400G to work at both DDR4-2133 and DDR4-3200 to see how much performance improved from using faster RAM. Normally, such a shift would also incur a hefty financial penalty, since RAM is typically priced by performance binning. In any given era, you’ll find a fairly flat area under the price curve — in this case, we would expect the slowest DDR4 (2133) to be priced quite similarly to moderately quicker RAM, like DDR4-2667 or DDR4-2933. Then the price curve would bend upwards at an increasing rate. If DDR4-3200 was 15 percent more expensive than DDR4-2667, we’d expect DDR4-3866 to be 30-40 percent more expensive than DDR4-3200 (all numbers are approximate).

But with the DRAM market overheated and expected to stay that way, we’ve seen some price compression around DRAM clocks. That’s not to say DDR4-3200 isn’t more expensive than DDR4-2133, but a pair of 8GB Crucial sticks will set you back $165, while a pair of DDR4-3200 G.Skill DIMMs will run you $185. That’s only about a 12 percent price difference, which isn’t much — if the Ryzen 5 2400G can use that additional performance.

We’ve run through the same suite of game tests that we used in our Ryzen 5 2400G review, only this time we’ve rerun them at DDR4-2133 clocks as well as DDR4-3200. The results are captured in the slideshow below:

In aggregate, we see very significant improvements between the two RAM clocks. In some cases, our minimum frame rates literally double. Even in the situations where this does not occur, the improvement is substantial. Average frame rates improved by 1.2x by shifting from DDR4-2133 to DDR4-3200, while minimum frame rates increased by 1.37x.

This is far better DRAM scaling than you’d expect to see in all but the most bandwidth-constrained scenarios if we were examining CPU performance. The gains are more than enough to visibly impact game performance. The typical rule of thumb is that people start to notice a performance gap of 10 percent, and DDR4-3200 improves the Ryzen 5 2400G’s performance on average by 2x that goal. Keeping high minimum frame rates is also important to maintaining strong performance, and those rates also shift upwards by an even larger amount.

Given the compressed nature of the DRAM stack and the sky-high prices on dGPUs, if you’re looking to the Ryzen 5 2400G’s GPU as a pit stop on your way to something better, I’d go ahead and buy the faster RAM. The overall performance improvement from doing so is much better than the additional cost, given current market conditions.

Continue reading

MSI’s Nvidia RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio Review: 2080 Ti Performance, Pascal Pricing
MSI’s Nvidia RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio Review: 2080 Ti Performance, Pascal Pricing

Nvidia's new RTX 3070 is a fabulous GPU at a good price, and the MSI RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio shows it off well.

Ryzen 9 5950X and 5900X Review: AMD Unleashes Zen 3 Against Intel’s Last Performance Bastions
Ryzen 9 5950X and 5900X Review: AMD Unleashes Zen 3 Against Intel’s Last Performance Bastions

AMD continues its onslaught on what was once Intel's undisputed turf.

Intel Is Spreading FUD About Supposedly Huge Ryzen 4000 Performance Drops on Battery
Intel Is Spreading FUD About Supposedly Huge Ryzen 4000 Performance Drops on Battery

Intel believes it has presented evidence that negates the value of AMD's Ryzen 4000 product stack. Intel is mistaken.

Current x86 vs. Apple M1 Performance Measurements Are Flawed
Current x86 vs. Apple M1 Performance Measurements Are Flawed

There's an intrinsic difference between x86 and ARM CPU designs that makes comparing performance difficult — and it didn't get noticed in the initial wave of coverage.