In this age of nearly unlimited image hacking available to photographers, photo contests have become a tricky business. Perhaps ironically, though, the internationally renowned Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition has for the second time had to disqualify a winning image because of a problem with the subject. In 2010, photographer José Luis Rodriguez was stripped of the overall first prize when contest organizers became aware that the Iberian Wolf he photographed was likely a tame animal available for use in photo shoots.
This year’s incident is even more strange. The winning photograph in the category Animals In Their Environment, purportedly of an anteater about to invade a termite mound lit by the stars and insect bio-luminescence, was in fact of a stuffed animal normally found near the entrance to the Emas National Park in Brazil where the image was captured (above). The image “The Night Raider,” taken by Marcio Cabral (top), was officially disqualified, as it was highly likely to be a taxidermy specimen. The disqualification was decided on after a team of five scientists agreed that the animal was likely not an actual, living, anteater.
It’s Not Surprising the Fraud Wasn’t Detected Earlier
I’ve entered the National History Museum’s Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition several times over the years, and have been fortunate enough to have a number of images make it through to the final judging level. So I know how carefully they evaluate submitted images that are being considered for prizes. As a start, of course, the submitted image has to be very high quality technically. Later in the process, an original (typically RAW) version of the image is requested.
What is unique about this particular deception is the step of verifying the image capture itself would not have detected the fraud. Unlike the case of the controversial World Press Photographer award-winning photo of a Palestinian funeral procession, the captured image didn’t need to be doctored after the fact in Photoshop. The fraud — as with the tame wolf — was in the creation of the scene.
In this case, the photographer had no other images of the anteater. Now, by itself that isn’t entirely unusual, for unusual sightings, especially at night. But anteaters aren’t exactly fast-moving, so it definitely didn’t help his cause. More damning was the scientists’ comparison of the animal’s “posture, morphology, raised tufts of fur, and patterns on the neck and head” to the stuffed version and conclusion that they were the same animal. Unfortunately, in addition to being a depressing development for wildlife photographers, it also means there will be no winner in that category for 2017. The contest is judged blind, but now the names and images of all the other finalists are public, so there is no way to re-judge them.
(Impala and Polar Bear image credit: David Cardinal)
New Jupiter Images From Juno Probe Reveal Amazing Detail
In a pair of recently released images, you can see an unprecedented amount of detail in Jupiter's clouds, and they were both created by citizen scientists.
NASA’s IMAGE Satellite Still Has Functional Power, Electronics Systems
NASA has fresh news about its IMAGE satellite, but there are still a lot of questions about why the hardware failed the way it did — or why it's operational again.
Windows 10 Is Adding an ‘Ultimate Performance’ Mode
Microsoft has announced new performance enhancing features baked into Windows 10 — but unless you own Windows 10 Pro for Workstations, they're not going to be available to you.
Scientists Think They Know Where Elon Musk’s Space Roadster Will Ultimately Land
Astronomy researchers have concluded that Elon Musk's Tesla is highly unlikely to impact Mars, but there are other, much more likely places in the solar system it could easily wind up.