Supreme Court Rules Police Need a Warrant to Track Your Phone
The US Supreme Court has sided with consumers to expand digital privacy rights in a closely watched case revolving around location data. In the 5-4 decision, the court ruled that police must obtain a valid search warrant before obtaining location data on a suspect from cellular carriers. So, you do have some expectation of privacy while using your phone, despite the objections of law enforcement.
The case was brought by Michigan man Timothy Carpenter, who was convicted of a string of robberies at Radio Shack and T-Mobile stores. FBI agents obtained several months of location data from Carpenter’s cellular carrier, thus proving he was in the vicinity of all the robberies. This piece of evidence was key in his conviction, but Carpenter’s lawyers appealed on the grounds that law enforcement didn’t get a warrant for the location data. As a result, they argued that the evidence and conviction should be thrown out.
Lower courts ruled against Carpenter, but the Supreme Court found that law enforcement does need a warrant to access mobile location information. Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the court’s four left-leaning Justices to secure the privacy win. In his majority opinion, Roberts suggests that cell phones have become almost a “feature of human anatomy.” Your phone goes everywhere that you go, so providing unfettered access to location data from that phone to police is a violation of Fourth Amendment protections. It would be no different than attaching an ankle monitor to the suspect.
The basis for past rulings was a 38-year-old Supreme Court case that found people didn’t have a reasonable expectation that their phone call records would be kept private because they were retained for billing purposes. Could that same logic apply to your location? The Justice Department argued in the case that your location information is not private because your carrier is already collecting it. Network-level location data isn’t as accurate as GPS, but it’s necessary for the carrier to ensure you’re connected to the right tower to place calls and access data.
Lower courts accepted the Justice Department’s rationale, but the Supreme Court has had the final word. Police will now need to obtain a warrant before getting location data from your mobile carrier. The court has also ruled in recent years that police need a warrant to search through your phone or attach a GPS tracking device to your vehicle. If you’re worried about privacy, things are moving in the right direction.
Continue reading
Supreme Court Sides With Google, Rules Java API Copying Was Fair Use
The Supreme Court has ruled against Oracle in its decade-long fair use case against Google. Google's copying of 37 Java APIs is protected under fair use.
New PC Power Rules Only Apply to Idle, as Alienware Squawks Alone
Alienware appears to be the only PC manufacturer getting bent out of shape about new electricity efficiency rules and the rules only apply to idle power anyway. Also, at least some of the PCs Alienware sells appear to be exempt.
Our Newest Celestial Visitor Is a Truly Gigantic Comet
Astronomers have found a gigantic comet, maybe the biggest ever: bigger than both of the moons of Mars put together. Earth is in no danger, but NASA is watching it closely as it coasts in toward the sun.
Apple Reportedly Buying Ads for High-Value Apps To Compensate for Epic Ruling
With Apple forced to let developers direct customers to non-Apple payment options, the iPhone maker has resorted to buying ads for high-value apps so it can keep getting its cut of subscriptions.