Judge: Police Can’t Force You to Unlock Phone With Fingerprint or Face ID
Every smartphone of note these days has some sort of biometric unlock option, be that fingerprint, iris scanning, or face unlock. US courts have held that your right against self-incrimination does not extend to these biometric features, making them less secure than a password. However, a federal judge just said quite the opposite in a ruling. The District Court for the Northern District of California says that police can’t force you to unlock a phone with your face or fingerprints.
This is a complicated situation, but it all traces back to the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution. That’s the one that forbids the government from forcing someone to give evidence against themselves. When you hear about someone “taking the fifth,” they’re refusing to answer a question on the grounds that it may incriminate them. The Fifth Amendment also means you don’t have to talk to the police — the rights police enumerate when arresting someone include “you have the right to remain silent.”
Courts have previously held that police can’t force a suspect to provide a password to unlock an electronic device. That counts as “testimonial” information and is protected by the Constitution. A body part is a different matter. Can a physical feature be protected under the Fifth Amendment? Most judges have said no, and police have used this rationale to unlock phones with the suspect’s fingerprints and more recently their face. That’s been a boon to investigators in this era when most phones are encrypted out of the box.
Now, judge Kandis Westmore has disagreed with that legal reasoning. The California case revolved around an attempted extortion scam in which a suspect demanded money to prevent the release of “embarrassing” videos. Police requested a search warrant that allowed them to unlock any smartphone found at the location using a fingerprint, face, or iris scan.
The judge, in this case, denied the warrant on two grounds. First, the request to search all phones at the location was overly broad. More significantly, Westmore equated biometric features to a password. “If a person cannot be compelled to provide a passcode because it is a testimonial communication, a person cannot be compelled to provide one’s finger, thumb, iris, face, or other biometric feature to unlock that same device,” the judge wrote. In short, forcing someone to use their body to unlock a phone counts as self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment.
Higher courts could easily disagree with this ruling, and the law is still very much unclear. Police will probably continue to use biometric features to unlock devices until someone mounts a major challenge to the practice that could take years to wind its way through the courts. In the meantime, a password is still the best way to protect your data.
Continue reading
Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmarks Show Even the Fastest GPU in the World Can’t Play at 4K
It was probably impossible for Cyberpunk 2077 to live up to the hype after eight years in development, but the performance issues aren't helping.
Why You Can’t Future-Proof Your Gaming PC
Trying to future-proof a system is a fool's errand. Plan your purchases intelligently, but don't pay a premium for features you can't use yet.
Cyberpunk 2077 Patch Delayed Because CDPR Employees Can’t Use Their PCs
CD Projekt Red reportedly doesn't have its VPN up and running two weeks after the hack that stole its source code. That's not a good sign.
Even Apple Can’t Sell Tiny Phones, Cuts iPhone 12 Mini Production 70 Percent
You probably heard a lot of banter about the tiny iPhone online, but a new report claims Apple vastly overestimated how many people would actually purchase the phone and has had to cut production by over 70 percent.