Apple’s Entry-Level M2 MacBook Pro Turns Into a Celeron Under Heavy Load
There’s an old adage in tech about never buying the first generation of any product. As far as Apple Silicon is concerned, however, you might be better off if you did. Reviewers keep finding new ways that the new, M2-equipped MacBook Pro base system is a weaker product than its predecessor. Now, there’s evidence from real-world tests that the M2-equipped base MacBook takes a hefty penalty when fully loaded. For now, only the baseline M2 with 256GB of SSD storage and 8GB of unified memory is known to be affected.
In the past few days, we’ve seen evidence that the entry-level MacBook Pro offers just half the SSD controller channels of the M1 and that this hits its theoretical storage performance. We also know that the 13″ base system gets as hot as 108C in tests. Thanks to a new video by the same channel, we’ve now got evidence that the M2-equipped system is also slower than the M1 in real-world tests — and not just massive, system-straining benchmarks, either.
Vadim Yuryev of YouTube tech channel Max Tech has been putting the M2 through its paces, including some tests between an 8GB M2 with both 256GB and 512GB of storage. This test isolates the impact of the SSD and reveals a problem with the design. At least some of the 8GB M1’s performance came courtesy of its SSD controller configuration — and with just one IC, the platform can’t maintain the same speeds.
A 12.5-percent performance hit doesn’t seem so bad, though we normally wouldn’t expect the shift from one NVMe SSD to another to cause this kind of disparity. But look what happens when Yuryev loads the system with a Chrome browsing session at the same time. Both of the systems above and below are 8GB systems:
This trend was not unique to Chrome; Safari looks the same. A 4K video export in a different application had the same problem. Performance tanks when a workload is put on the system, and responsiveness suffers. These problems continue throughout a number of benchmarks. Once the RAM on the M2 is full, the system often takes a heavy performance hit. The M1 does not.
In these tests, the 512GB M2 model isn’t 15 percent faster, it’s 55 percent faster. And according to Max Tech’s video, system responsiveness on the systems with 8GB of RAM goes in the tank once these exports kick into gear. The 16GB variant tested didn’t have these problems. While the M1-equipped system also lost performance when equipped with just 8GB of RAM instead of 16GB, the performance hit was smaller. The M1 with 8GB was 1.23x slower than the M1 16GB. The M2 8GB is 1.79x slower.
Why is This Happening?
The problem here is that the M2 is being forced to stream data off the SSD once it runs out of main memory. The baseline M1 has two physical connections to the ICs that make up its SSD. The M2 has one. This means that when the system attempts to lean on the SSD in place of additional memory, the M2 can’t keep the CPU fed.
Tellingly, we see an impact on performance in some workloads even when DRAM isn’t being pushed. The M2’s lower storage bandwidth can hit non-compute benchmarks as well as expensive, high-fidelity multimedia presentations.
Does this matter? I’d argue that it does, for several reasons:
First, this is a clear performance regression over the first-generation product and that’s never good. Second, it introduces uncertainty and doubt in the product line. In some cases, a first-generation M1 system is now 1.15x – 1.8x faster than a second-generation M2 system. Third, Apple is doing a poor job of communicating exactly how much DRAM its customers need to pay for in order to enjoy an M2 that isn’t functionally crippled.
There’s no such thing as memory upgrades if you buy an M1 or an M2. There’s no way to buy a system now and double its RAM in a few years, when DDR5 prices come down. The RAM total you pick today will need to last the system the rest of its life, which is why it’s a little concerning that Apple didn’t disclose how big a performance hit the M2 would take on account of its gimpy storage. Apple, if anything, needs to do a better job than an equivalent PC manufacturer in communicating how important RAM loadout is to the long-term life of a system.
Fourth, there’s evidence that the M2 user experience goes straight to hell if you tap its RAM out, while the M1 doesn’t. Watching Tech Max try to surf the web on the 8GB M2 while running workloads gave me flashbacks to running antivirus scans and web surfing during the Bad Old single-core days.
I suspect Apple would argue that the various workloads Yuryev tested aren’t representative of the workloads they expect customers to run. That’s fair, to a point — but only to a point. The first-generation of Apple Silicon has no problems in the same workloads, with the same RAM. Furthermore, Apple did not reach out to reviewers and advise them to stick to easier tests when the M1 reviews went out back in 2020.
An awful lot of audio/video benchmarks got published showing that an M1-equipped laptop was capable of beating an Apple Intel desktop, and I know a few people personally who took advantage of the Apple Silicon launch to swap CPU manufacturers. The baseline M2 is a clear step backwards from the M1 in that regard. This is especially true if you are stretching to afford a new MacBook. 8GB of RAM isn’t that much these days no matter what, but if you have to buy a system with just 8GB, buy the M1-based system that takes a 25 percent performance hit and remains responsive when it runs out of memory, not the M2 entry-level MacBook Pro that takes a 1.8x shi performance hit and turns into a 1990s Celeron as far as responsiveness is concerned.
Don’t Buy an Entry-Level M2
At this point, there is no reason to consider a 13-inch M2 MacBook if you have the option to buy a different MacBook. An 8GB M1 system matches an 8GB M2 system in other compute benchmarks and is both cooler and will remain responsive under heavy load. While these problems do not appear to afflict the other models, which offer more RAM, fans, and SSD storage, the M2-powered MacBook Pro starts at $1299. That’s well into boutique territory for PC laptops, and it ought to buy you a system that can perform one high performance task while simultaneously surfing the internet. With the M1, it does. With the M2, it doesn’t.
Complicating matters is the fact that these base models are the only ones available from Apple itself with no wait. If you want one of the non-crippled machines, you’re looking at a several-week delay and a lot more money — or you could just buy an M1, possibly on sale.
Max Tech’s numbers indicate the SSD downgrade can impact performance by 0-15 percent on the M2 system, while opting for 8GB instead of 16GB of RAM can hit performance 2x harder on the M2 compared to M1. I have been enthusiastic about Apple Silicon from the beginning, but a good chip needs a good laptop, and the baseline 13-inch MacBook Pro is clearly compromised. Caveat emptor.
Continue reading
Benchmark Results Show Apple M1 Beating Every Intel-Powered MacBook Pro
Apple's new M1 SoC can beat every single Intel system it sells, at least in one early benchmark result. We dig into the numbers and the likely competitive situation.
Apple May Build 40-Core ARM-Based Mac Pro, Plans 10-Core MacBook Pro
Apple is said to be prepping multiple ARM cores for launch, including 20-core and 40-core CPUs planned for the Mac Pro.
Apple Accidentally Outed Upcoming M1X-Powered MacBook Pro
Apple's WWDC event this year was filled to the brim with big software announcements, including new versions of iOS and macOS, but the rumored MacBook Pro revamp didn't happen. However, Apple may have accidentally revealed its plans in that regard.
Bloomberg: M1X MacBook Pro Could Launch in the ‘Next Several Weeks’
According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman the new MacBooks (which contain Apple's latest M1X CPU) should hit shelves within the next several weeks.