Obsessively Checking News Linked to Anxiety, Stress, Ill Health, Study Finds

One doesn’t need a college degree or a stint in the lab to realize that this might be a problem for our collective mental health. To cement that rationale, researchers from Texas Tech University conducted a study using survey data from 1,100 United States adults to examine whether constant news exposure negatively impacted people’s health. They found that about 16.5 percent of Americans consume the news on a “severely problematic” basis. (For the sake of the study, “severely problematic” referred to compulsive news-checking that interfered in some way with a person’s life.) More than half of them experience physical illness that correlates with or is caused by such consumption. Even worse, 73.6 percent of them experience diminished mental wellness. From fatigue and gastrointestinal issues to stress and anxiety, those who were constantly in the loop were taking a hit to their physical and mental health.

Because their statistical findings essentially confirmed what many already suspected, the researchers focused less on the fact that “news junkies” experienced diminished health and more on why this tends to occur. They first cited the concept of “transportation,” in which someone reading or watching content becomes “fully immersed in a narrative world.” While the term transportation is usually applied to fiction, the researchers found that modern news stories, being designed to catch attention and often being multimedia, can make one susceptible to transportation too.

“This is not surprising given that news stories are intentionally selected and presented in a manner that highlights the presence of conflict and drama as a means to capture and hold the audience’s attention,” they write in the journal Health Communication. “Like entertainment content, the news typically uses a storytelling format that features a plot revolving around heroes, victims, and villains, which can lead individuals to become transported into these narrative worlds.”

Transportation is a gateway of sorts into preoccupation, in which an already completed activity dominates one’s thoughts. After consuming a news story, some people “tend to ruminate and continuously worry about stressful events or imagined futures.” (Fear of another global pandemic is a common one these days, as is ruminating about the chance of nuclear war.) If the consumption-transportation-preoccupation cycle continues, it could be considered misregulation, or a failure to sufficiently self-regulate one’s news consumption.

The researchers point out that misregulation is often the result of attempting to “regulate short-term affect,” meaning the person believes looking at more news might help in the short term. (Sticking with our previous example, this could mean looking up reasons not to worry about nuclear conflict…and then seeing stories with conflicting information, resulting in increased anxiety.) In some cases, the researchers note, this can result in “a downward spiral of increasing dysphoria”—what many of us refer to as “doomscrolling.”

Perhaps the most problematic result of news over-consumption is interference, in which one’s failure to regulate their news consumption has an effect on other parts of their life. This might be characterized as the point in which the news, excessive consumption of the news, or one’s reaction to the news impacts their relationships. It might also decrease their ability to work, study, relax, or sleep. These people make up the 16.5 percent of survey participants referenced earlier.

The researchers note that more investigation will be required to determine what makes some people more resilient against news over-consumption than others, as well as how some people are better at mitigating the effects of news over-consumption in a healthy way. In the meantime, if you’re someone who doomscrolls, it isn’t exactly a bad idea to limit your time spent looking at the news (or social media, where news stories frequently manifest). Think of it as a gift to your brain and your body.

Continue reading

New Study Suggests Dark Matter Doesn’t Exist

Most scientists currently believe the iron grip of gravity is augmented by dark matter, an invisible material that makes up about 85 percent of the universe. A new study makes the case for an alternative model, one in which dark matter doesn't exist and gravity works a little differently than we thought.

Google Shuts Down Stadia Games Studio, Plans to License Tech

Google says this is just part of a larger strategy to strengthen its Stadia partnerships, but this feels like the beginning of the end for Google's game streaming platform.

Scientists Can Finally Study Einsteinium 69 Years After Its Discovery

In the remnants of atomic explosions, scientists found never-before-seen elements like einsteinium. Now, almost 70 years after its discovery, scientists have collected enough einsteinium to conduct some basic analysis.

Samsung Stuffs 1.2TFLOP AI Processor Into HBM2 to Boost Efficiency, Speed

Samsung has developed a new type of processor-in-memory, built around HBM2. It's a new achievement for AI offloading and could boost performance by up to 2x while cutting power consumption 71 percent.