Google Fails to Win Dismissal of Incognito Mode Lawsuit
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bc9/78bc9dac1504221bb13d0c150dff19ec9d8d421a" alt="Google Fails to Win Dismissal of Incognito Mode Lawsuit"
Google has failed to win the dismissal of a class-action lawsuit over Incognito Mode in its Chrome browser. Judge Lucy Koh denied Google’s request, saying the company did not sufficiently warn users that Incognito Mode isn’t really incognito. The lawsuit claims Google still tracks users across the internet, even if they’re using Incognito Mode. Google’s defense is not that the plaintiffs are mistaken, but rather that it told everyone very clearly they could still be tracked.
Google added Incognito Mode to the Chrome browser just a few months after release in 2008 — it was one of the first browsers to add this feature, and others followed in its footsteps. Now, you can access similar private browsing modes on every major browser, but not everyone is happy with the offering. The plaintiffs in the case say Google is breaking wiretapping laws by continuing to track users who have enabled Incognito.
Incognito Mode works just like all those other private browsing modes. It’s basically guest mode. The browser doesn’t save any of your history or cookies after the end of an Incognito session, but the websites and services you come in contact with on the internet will still be able to track you. For example, if you log into Gmail in an Incognito window, Google still gets all the same data as if you were using a regular window.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad6f0/ad6f0eb382f379064c6e0dd9cc811086c119f9d6" alt="Google Fails to Win Dismissal of Incognito Mode Lawsuit"
Google explains this on the start page when you launch a new incognito window, but many people fail to understand how this mode works. Many people incorrectly believe that Incognito Mode hides your activity from Google and other online service providers. The class-action lawsuit would seem to imply that Google’s efforts to clarify things have been insufficient to the point it runs afoul of the law. This is in spite of what I would consider a very clear warning every time you open a new incog window. So why are people confused? Is it the branding? The UI? The little icon with the hat and sunglasses? I’m sure the lawyers for plaintiffs will have something to say about this when the case goes before a judge.
Even if the lawsuit succeeds, you should not expect to see a big payday. Lawyers claim that millions of people have been affected by Google’s incognito tracking. So, any cash settlement will be split up into tiny fragments, except for the lawyers who will get a large chunk of the money. Maybe you’ll get some Google freebies if you’re lucky.
Continue reading
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0716c/0716c4df50bb9a4b32f2ad52fb55673d70c8ad04" alt="Google Pixel Slate Owners Report Failing Flash Storage"
Google Pixel Slate Owners Report Failing Flash Storage
Google's product support forums are flooded with angry Pixel Slate owners who say their devices are running into frequent, crippling storage errors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c5c4/6c5c45a7083ebbb01c25e88315bc8a11043a9391" alt="Google Kills Free Photo Storage, Changes What Counts Toward Storage Caps"
Google Kills Free Photo Storage, Changes What Counts Toward Storage Caps
Google has announced some significant changes to Photos, especially if you use the service for automatic backup.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab045/ab045ef351186f26bddcb540416b8bca22048f0b" alt="Time to Update: Google Patches 2 Severe Zero-Day Chrome Vulnerabilities"
Time to Update: Google Patches 2 Severe Zero-Day Chrome Vulnerabilities
Unlike the last few zero-days, Google didn't find these security holes itself. Instead, it was tipped by anonymous third-parties, and the problems are severe enough that it hasn't released full details. Suffice it to say, you should stop putting off that update.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e317/7e317cba6511095a09dc0a57ac8d43fc24acb0f6" alt="Nvidia, Google to Support Cloud Gaming on iPhone Via Web Apps"
Nvidia, Google to Support Cloud Gaming on iPhone Via Web Apps
Both Nvidia and Google have announced iOS support for their respective cloud gaming platforms via progressive web applications. Apple can't block that.