States Claim Google’s ‘Privacy Sandbox’ Violates Antitrust Law
Google finds itself in an impossible position. Privacy advocates have long demanded the company follow Microsoft and Mozilla’s lead in purging tracking cookies from Chrome. Now that it’s doing so, a group of state attorneys general has filed an amended antitrust complaint that uses the so-called “Privacy Sandbox” as ammunition against the company. It may be impossible to please everyone when your browser owns most of the internet.
Google announced its intention to phase out third-party cookies last summer. Firefox and Edge just pulled the plug on cookies, but Google is an advertising company. So, it opted to slowly move away from cookies while it worked with the ad industry to devise a new, open system for ad targeting known broadly as the Privacy Sandbox.
One of Google’s antitrust woes is the state-level case brought by 15 (mostly Republican) attorneys general. Texas AG Ken Paxton leads this case currently, and his state updated the lawsuit against Google to call out the Privacy Sandbox. According to the new filing, Google is “trying to hide its true intentions behind a pretext of privacy.”
The filing uses an argument that has been popular among Google critics online. The AGs allege that by blocking third-party tracking cookies, Google is actually walling off a portion of the internet — specifically the 60-ish percent of online consumers who use the Chrome browser. That would, apparently, make Google’s replacement more desirable simply because it has so much market share. Google, of course, disagrees with this argument. The company told The Verge that Paxton’s office has misunderstood what the Privacy Sandbox is and how it works with the open internet.
While I’m no expert, I find the pro-cookie claims in the amended complaint tough to support. It doesn’t make a distinction between first and third-party cookies at all. No one likes third-party tracking cookies, and we’ve all been haranguing Google over its indecision for years. The announcement that it would block cookies last year was widely praised. Just last week, Google confirmed it would not work on a replacement for third-party tracking cookies. Instead, its proposed technologies would allow for targeting of small groups without following individuals around the internet.
Whether this all amounts to Google unfairly leveraging its market position will be decided in court. This comes at the same time the US Justice Department is running its own parallel investigation of Google. The next few years will either affirm or transform Google’s business model.
Continue reading
Report: Apple Ignored its Partners’ Repeated Violations of Chinese Labor Laws
Apple has reportedly turned a blind eye to repeated violations of Chinese labor law in its partners' factories over the past six years.
Apple Sued for Antitrust Violations With Apple Pay
According to an antitrust lawsuit filed by Affinity Credit Union, Apple has abused its market position with Apple Pay to keep other companies out, earning fees on every tap-and-pay iPhone transaction.
Meta Hit With Class Action Suit Over iOS Anti-Tracking Violations
Apple’s App Tracking Transparency policy requires that apps get permission from individual users before tracking them across sites owned by other companies—something Meta allegedly didn’t do.
Apple Sued for Allegedly Collecting User Data, Violating Its Own Privacy Policies
Privacy is apparently an unrealistic expectation, even if you take all the right steps to ensure it.