Microsoft: Activision Blizzard Has ‘No Must Have’ Titles

“There is nothing unique about the video games developed and published by Activision Blizzard that is a ‘must have’ for rival PC and console video game distributors that give rise to a foreclosure concern,” Microsoft writes. The filing was first spotted yesterday by Rock Paper Shotgun (who understandably referred to the statement as a “weird flex, but okay”).

While it might appear at first like Microsoft is testing the type of reverse psychology that Tom Sawyer used to get his friends to do his chores, the filing provides additional context. When Microsoft mentions “foreclosure concerns,” it’s specifically referring to post-acquisition Activision’s ability to foreclose other game distributors from accessing the content they need to participate and compete in the market—a major concern for those wary of the potential merger. From Microsoft’s perspective, the filing is meant to reassure the Commission that the acquisition wouldn’t disrupt industry competition. By saying none of Activision’s games are all that important, it’s displaying (or at least feigning) confidence that other distributors will continue to be able to compete…albeit in kind of a weird way.

Though almost half of the filing is spent explaining the intricacies of the video game market to the Commission, the other half attempts to defend Microsoft from horizontal competition concerns. Microsoft argues that due to the market’s fragmented nature, it couldn’t develop what most of us would consider a monopoly; post-transaction, plenty of “industry heavyweights” would remain, along with “a vibrant long tail of smaller competitors.” The company points to Tencent (which owns Riot Games and has a stake in Epic Games) and Nintendo before digging into Sony’s murky waters.

Despite Sony’s despair regarding Microsoft’s potential acquisition of Activision, Microsoft reminds the Commission that Sony owns Naughty Dog and has recently acquired Bungie, further cementing its place as the second largest player in the industry. Later on in the filing, Microsoft speculates that Sony will remain a particularly rigorous competitor in relation to subscription services—something Activision only offers in-game.

Speaking of Sony (which insists that Call of Duty, one of Activision’s top franchises, is an unreplicable “blockbuster”) Microsoft’s filing makes mention of its commitment to keeping Call of Duty multi-platform: “Microsoft has demonstrated that it is not withdrawing content from other platforms, having made multiple public statements that it will continue to make Call of Duty and other popular Activision Blizzard titles available on PlayStation through the term of any existing agreement and beyond.”

Continue reading

Pretty Sure We’re Prepared This Time: Blizzard Confirms Burning Crusade Classic

Blizzard has confirmed that World of Warcraft Classic is getting a partner. Step through the Dark Portal once again when The Burning Crusade Classic comes online.

Blizzard’s Diablo II Remaster Will Support 20-Year-Old Save Files

Blizzard is working on a remastered version of Diablo II, and it will be very faithful to the original. How faithful? Blizzard producer Matthew Cederquist confirms save files from the original game will work with the remaster, allowing you to finish the quest you started two decades ago.

Report: Blizzard Knew Warcraft 3 Was a Mess and Launched It Anyway

Fans were hyped, but the Warcraft 3: Reforged launch did not live up to expectations. According to a newly leaked document, Blizzard knew the game was a mess, but it released it anyway.

Blizzard Dropped True Ultrawide Support From Diablo II: Resurrected Because It Breaks the Game

After nerfing 21:9 ultrawide support in the last phase of the beta, Blizzard has now explained the reason: true ultrawide support breaks the game.