MIT: Taxing Robots Might Stave Off Job Loss, Income Inequality

MIT isn’t new to the concept of robots’ effects on labor and income disparity. Last month the university completed a study confirming automation’s tendency to displace lower-income workers while increasing corporations’ (and their executives’) bottom lines. Scholars have been researching ways to embrace autonomous technologies while staving off job loss for years, and MIT’s most recent study on the subject suggests that a robot tax would do the trick.

The tax would incentivize companies to retain human workers while compensating for some of the payroll tax lost by a reduction in force. Arnaud Costinot and Iván Werning, two professors of economics at MIT, analyzed the rate at which robots tend to replace human workers to devise the ideal tax range. Also incorporated were displaced workers’ typical income levels as well as income taxes, the latter of which are meant to address income inequality to a certain extent.

An effective robot tax would likely sit between 1% and 3.7%, according to the economists’ calculations. Much higher than this, and the tax would exaggerate the role robots play in operational routines; go lower, and companies won’t be incentivized to keep their human employees at all.

Decades ago, robots were thought to be a form of futuristic technology capable of reducing humans’ workloads and facilitating a simpler, stress-free life. But rather than giving way to Jetsons-like leisure, the advent of semi- and fully-autonomous robots has exacerbated existing labor and income disparity. Companies like Tesla and Amazon, which are known for using cutting-edge robotics in their factories and warehouses, are also known for pushing dangerously long workdays and underpaying—not to mention dehumanizing—the very employees automation is meant to assist. When these systems fail, it’s often the employees at the bottom of the food chain who end up taking the blame. (It’s worth mentioning that both of these examples are headed by disproportionately wealthy people, too.)

Automation obviously isn’t going anywhere. Robots will continue to make their way into industries like agriculture and law enforcement, while artificial intelligence (an entirely separate field of study, yet equally built for convenience) takes on illustration and coding. This means ideas like MIT’s small robot tax are virtually guaranteed to mature in the coming years.

Continue reading

Massive ‘Kilonova’ Explosion Shows First Observed Birth of a Magnetar

We've never seen a magnetar come into being, but a new high-energy event several billion light years away might be the first — a kilonova that signals the merging of two neutron stars.

How Intel Lost $10 Billion and the Mobile Market

How did Intel — the most advanced foundry in the world — manage to spend so many billions of dollars on mobile technology with so little to show for it?

How Intel Lost the Mobile Market, Part 2: The Rise and Neglect of Atom

In Part 2 we explore the specific decisions Intel made, the rise and neglect of Atom, and why the company's superior foundry technology wasn't enough to conquer the mobile market.

Semiconductor Shortage Could Cost Automakers $61B in Lost Sales

Discussions between the auto industry and its chip manufacturing partners also sound as if they could be going better.